https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Bug ID: 64830 Summary: HTTP2 : GOAWAY sent with Protocol Error and Frame Size Error Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.39 Hardware: HP OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: Catalina Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] Target Milestone: ----- Sub-Component - Coyote OS : Redhat Linux Overview: Embedded Tomcat version 9.0.39 is implemented to transport http/2 packets between 2 systems (h2c connection). Http2 packets of payload size 55KB sent from the client are processed asynchronously . The content-type of request/response is application/json. For few requests Tomcat sends GOAWAY with reason that seems irrelevant . 1)GOAWAY with PROTOCOL ERROR : The content length header value [55294] does not agree with the size of the data received [55295] Where, both the content length header value and the size of the data received is 55295 bytes 2)GOAWAY with FRAME_SIZE_ERROR : The payload is [6386210] bytes long but the max frame size is [16384] Where , the payload size is only around 55 KB Please find attached the PCAPs for reference. We have tried and reproduced these exceptions with a sample code implementing embedded tomcat version 9.0.39 with payload size of around 55KB . Please find below the steps to reproduce. I have attached the sample code / input JMX file to reproduce the issue. Steps to Reproduce: With JMeter as simulation client, on configuring 700 threads (700 connections) to connect towards Tomcat Server 9.0.39 embedded in our system and on sending 20 requests per second with payload of 55KB (same request with just one json value sent uniquely via the Random number generator)and on letting the test run in an infinite loop , few requests are getting timed out . On analysing the PCAP for the particular request we see that tomcat sends GOAWAY with PROTOCOL ERROR / FRAME_SIZE_ERROR where the reason seems to be incorrect. Client: JMeter 5.3 with additional HTTP2 sampler. No of threads: 700 Ramp-up period:10 seconds Loop:Infinite Payload size: around 55KB Constant Throughput Timer added to limit the tps to 20. Random Variable Generator added to the JSON request to uniquely identify for which request the exception is printed and to map it in the PCAP collected . Response Timeout : 5000 ms SERVER: Sample application attached . MaxThreads configured in tomcat is 200(all other parameters are the tomcat defaults). The input requests are processed asynchronously with 40 threads. Build: Embedded tomcat 9.0.39 Resolution/Clarification requested: Can you please explain the root cause for this . Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #1 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 37513 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37513&action=edit FRAME_SIZE_ERROR PCAP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #2 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 37514 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37514&action=edit PROTOCOL ERROR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #3 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 37515 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37515&action=edit JMX file to reproduce issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #4 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 37516 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37516&action=edit Sample application to reproduce the issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #5 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Any update on this please ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #6 from Remy Maucherat <[hidden email]> --- Pinging for updates on BZs is not allowed. This is not the first time you are doing this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat <[hidden email]> --- *** Bug 64829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat <[hidden email]> --- *** Bug 64828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- What hardware are you running this on? I've been running the test case locally for 15+ mins and I haven't seen a single error reported. Details are hardware used, memory allocated to Tomcat and JMeter, network between client and server would likely be helpful. If we can't recreate the issue, we can't debug it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Moving to NEEDINFO as more information about the provided test case is required to reproduce the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Arshiya <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW --- Comment #11 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Mark , In production we see the issue reported in this bug and bug 64828 on Linux. I had reproduced the issue with the attached source code on my local windows machine (Windows 10 - 64 bit / 16 GB RAM). JMeter version :5.3 with Xmx:5g Embedded tomcat application :Default Xmx Thanks in advance !! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Thanks. I can try testing on a similar spec machine (although it will be a VM). How long does the test case have to be running before you start to see errors? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Arshiya <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW --- Comment #13 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Thanks Mark . Within 15 to 20 minutes of running the case I was able to see the errors , Please let us know if you need more information . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Success. This was trivial to recreate on Windows. Must be a timing thing. Fix on the way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #15 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Fixed in: - 10.0.x for 10.0.0-M10 onwards - 9.0.x for 9.0.40 onwards - 8.5.x for 8.5.60 onwards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #16 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Thank you soo much Mark for the fix .. One clarification please, Were you able to reproduce and fix the payload related issue reported in bug 64828 as well ? Thanks in advance ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- I didn't see any payload errors reported. The other errors occurred after a few seconds on Windows so I fixed those then ran a longer test (20 mins) where no errors where observed. I don't immediately see how the issues I fixed could led to the payload errors described. It would be informative if you were to test the latest 9.0.x code and report back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Arshiya <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #18 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Hi Mark , I tried running the same test program with the latest tomcat 9.0.41 jars on windows machine . 1.)I am still able to see the incomplete payload related exceptions and GOAWAY (PROTOCOL_ERROR and FRAME_SIZE_ERROR) . The test (payload size 55KB) ran for about 8 minutes where few requests had timed-out (could see in JMeter GUI). On filtering the requests in the PCAP captured with the unique identifier , I was able to find the trace for 3 requests with the below reason for GOAWAY (GOAWAY.pcap attached) *) FRAME_SIZE_ERROR:The payload is [2128653] bytes long but the maximum frame size is [16384] *) PROTOCOL_ERROR :Connection [7004], Stream [1], The content length header value [56,465] does not agree with the size of the data received [56,466] *) PROTOCOL_ERROR :Connection [7092], Stream [1], The content length header value [56,466] does not agree with the size of the data received [56,466] Specs: Windows 10 Processor:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8350U CPU @ 1.70GHz 1.90GHz RAM:16 GB System Type : 64 bit Please let me know in case of further inputs. Thanks in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
--- Comment #19 from Arshiya <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 37600 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37600&action=edit PCAP with Goaway -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |