https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65001
Bug ID: 65001 Summary: HTTPNIO non-blocking IO servlet 3.1 API may fail to alert webapp that a request is complete Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.41 Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] Target Milestone: ----- Created attachment 37624 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37624&action=edit Test servlet Under certain IO error conditions, tomcat will fail to alert that an asynchronous request is completed and destroyed. Both the AsyncListener's onComplete method and ServletRequestListener's requestDestroyed method are not called. This may cause a webapp to believe that a request is still valid while tomcat has already recycled the objects. I was able to reproduce this issue using a WriteListener (non-blocking IO servlet API 3.1) with the httpnio connector on the latest tomcat release (9.0.41). This appears to be caused when an IOException is raised while attempting to write to the ServletOutputChannel during the WriteListener's onWritePossible callback. It also seems possible to trigger this issue by manually throwing an exception in the onWritePossible callback. The following exception can also be seen in the logs: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Calling [asyncPostProcess()] is not valid for a request with Async state [ERROR] I've attached a test servlet that demonstrates this issue. To simulate IO errors, an http request is aborted before the full response body is read. The servlet then records various async callbacks it receives and it can be seen that some callbacks are not always called, i.e. the AsyncListener's onComplete callback and ServletRequestListener's requestDestroyed callback. The servlet compares synchronous requests, asynchronous requests, and asynchronous requests with non-blocking IO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65001
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All Hardware|PC |All -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65001
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Thanks for the really good test case. I've found a (hopefully the) bug. I'm currently working on a fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65001
Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas <[hidden email]> --- Thanks again for the test case. A good test case really does make a huge difference to how easily we can fix a bug. Fixed in: - 10.0.x for 10.0.1 onwards - 9.0.x for 9.0.42 onwards - 8.5.x for 8.5.62 onwards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |